Supercritical Fluid Extraction
(SFE) Systems uses supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) instead of
an organic solvent. Yes, carbon dioxide. However, the word ‘supercritical’ is
an important keyword in this system. Supercritical fluid is a state that happens
when a fluid is above its critical Temperature (TC) and critical
pressure (PC), when it is between the typical gas and liquid state.
For CO2, the TC is 32.1 oC and the PC
is 73.8 bar. Around the supercritical region, CO2 can dissolve
triglycerides at concentrations up to 1% mass.
Figure 1. Phase
diagram of carbon dioxide
Why industry gone through the
hassle of providing the environment that makes CO2 liquid when other
traditional organic solvents are readily liquid at STP for extraction? This is
because carbon dioxide is inexpensive, readily available, non-toxic and
harmless to the environment.
So how does it work? We need to
know about the equipment first.
Figure 2. Parts of
the equipment involved in SFE
Let’s start with the CO2
cylinder, it stores CO2 (obviously). Then there is cooler which
involves in CO2 liquefaction. It is connected to a high-pressure
syringe pump which is capable to build pressure up to 69 MPa (690 bar). The
parts in the dotted square in Figure 2 are classed as SC-CO2. They
are equipped with a heated capillary restrictor with maximum operating
temperature of 150 oC. The pressure and temperature are controlled
by software.
“The
density of the SC-CO2 at around 200 bar is close to that of hexane;
and the solvation characteristics are also similar to hexane”
To extract the desired compound,
the sample need to be placed in the extraction cell and pressurized with CO2
to dissolve the sample. The SC-CO2 together with the dissolved
compound are transferred to a fraction or oil collector. Then the contents are depressurized,
and SC-CO2 will lose its solvating ability which will precipitate
the desired material in the trap section. The condensed CO2 can be
recycled back or released to atmosphere.
Now that we know the concept of
SFE, it’s time for us to learn the sciency stuffs that optimize the process. To
optimize the extraction process, we need to control pressure, temperature and
incubation time as they are the factors that can affect the extraction yield. In
this article, we will focus on optimization of enzyme interesterification of camel
hump fat to maximize cocoa butter extraction by using SC-CO2 as a
solvent to ease the production.
Higher pressure can indirectly cause
low yield of cocoa butter. How? Physical properties of SC-CO2 are
density dependant and the density of SC-CO2 depends on pressure. The
power of SC-CO2 will increase as the density increase. This will
cause the SC-CO2 to react with the enzyme and produces carbamates
and frees the amine group at the surface of the enzyme. Hence, the enzyme will
be inactivated thus lowering the cocoa butter yield.
Temperature also plays a role in
maximizing the cocoa butter production as increase in temperature will increase
the enzyme activity in SC-CO2 thus increases the cocoa butter yield. However, once the temperature goes above 50 oC, enzyme can be
destroyed as they are sensitive to high temperature. If the enzyme used can
withstand high temperature, the production of cocoa butter will still decreases
as the density of SC-CO2 lowers down and loses its solvation power.
The optimum incubation time to
achieve maximum yield of cocoa butter is 3 hours. Lower than that it will not have
enough time for the desired reaction to occur and more than that, acyl
migration (Oleic acid from sn-2 position of triglycerides which about 90% of it
comprise the TAG of cocoa butter) will increase. Both will lower down the yield
of cocoa butter.
Cleaner
technology is relatively a new thing and method of approach to control
pollution. This method, which promotes reduction, recycling and even elimination
of source of waste by preventing and recycling the wastes generated, is clearly
more environmental friendly and acceptable. Since the concept is still new,
there is no specific regulation yet regarding the usage of SC-CO2 in
cocoa butter equivalent extraction.
In most
countries, regulation regarding waste handling is focused on implementation of waste
treatment and disposal scheme with the aim to meet discharge or emission
standards. Although this contributed significantly to protection of
environment, it is still not the best approach to manage environmental
pollution. In some cases, this method is problematical and resulted in transfer
of pollutants, especially the hazardous one from one medium to the other.
In
conclusion, SFE is an alternative to liquid extraction using traditional organic
solvent such as hexane or dichloromethane. There will always remain some
residual solvent in the extract and matrix, so there will always be some level
of environmental contamination from the usage of traditional organic solvent. This
is the complete opposite when SC-CO2 is used. CO2 is easy
to be removed (simply reduce the pressure), it leaves almost no trace, and also
non-destructive to environment. Soil Association approves the usage of CO2
in SFE for organic products.
References:
References:
- Akhter, S., Mcdonald, M. A., & Marriott, R. (2016). Mangifera sylvatica (Wild Mango): A new cocoa butter alternative. Scientific Reports,6(1). doi:10.1038/srep32050
- Jahurul, M., Zaidul, I., Sahena, F., Sharifudin, M., Norulaini, N., Ali, M. E., . . . Omar, A. (2018). Physicochemical properties of cocoa butter replacers from supercritical carbon dioxide extracted mango seed fat and palm oil mid-fraction blends. International Food Research Journal, 25(1), 143-149. http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/25%20(01)%202018/(18).pdf
- Mayadevi, S. (2012). Reactions in supercritical carbon dioxide, 51, 1298–1305.
- Naik, B., & Kumar, V. (2014). Cocoa Butter and Its Alternatives: A Reveiw. Journal of Bioresource Engineering and Technology, 1, 7–17.
- Norhuda, I., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) as a clean technology for palm kernel oil extraction. J Biochem Tech,1(3), 75-78. Retrieved December 15, 2018, from http://jbiochemtech.com/3two.pdf
- Sapkale, G. N., S. M. Patil, U. S. Surwase, and P. K. Bhatbhage, Supercritical fluid extraction - A review, International Journal of Chemical Sciences, 2010. 8(2): p. 729-743. Retrieved from https://www.tsijournals.com/articles/supercritical-fluid-extraction--a-review.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment